A litigation partner at a top 40 UK law firm is urging fellow lawyers to be supportive of people who are representing themselves in court hearings.
Peter Brewer, partner at Clarke Willmott LLP, says managing a litigant in person (known as a LiP) can be an essential part of how a case is handled.
“Failure to connect with a LiP can have a serious adverse impact on the overall progress of a case, so it is incumbent on lawyers to take steps to help the case run fairly and smoothly,” said Peter.
“Dealing with an unrepresented opponent can make litigation much more challenging and frequently increase the time, and therefore the costs, involved in a case.”
Recent years have seen a rise in the number of people representing themselves in court due in part to a decline in legal aid funding and the increasing costs of running litigation brought about, in part, by the current court fees.
“Litigants in person often do not understand the court rules which govern the procedure and may not have a grasp on legal principle or rely on ‘bad’ research they found online,” added Peter.
“They could refuse to engage with proceedings, or on occasion, exhibit disruptive behaviour, or have difficulties accepting a decision of the court.
“However, solicitors are expected to behave professionally towards LiPs and are not allowed to take unfair advantage of the fact they do not have their own lawyer by, and must take reasonable steps to guide them through the litigation process, obviously without giving them legal advice. That in itself is a delicate balancing act for the solicitor to perform.
“Although the solicitor cannot give the unrepresented party legal or tactical advice; the court may ask them to explain court procedure to the litigant in person.
“While the court might appear to be ‘helping’, it is only being done to make sure that the court hearing is fair.”
In some situations, the judge may ask the party who has legal representation to deal with some practical matters such as preparing the bundles of court papers.
The judge might also need to spend time making sure that the unrepresented party understands what is happening and is dealing with the right points.
When engaging with LiPs Peter recommends using neutral and clear language, assisting the court as much as appropriate, being non-adversarial, reminding unrepresented parties of hearings in advance, keeping barristers informed, and attending court early as pre-trial negotiations may take longer.
Peter Brewer deals with the resolution of complex, high value commercial disputes, and is a specialist in acting on corporate litigation involving shareholders, directors, investors and other business stakeholders.
Clarke Willmott LLP is a national law firm with seven offices across the country, in Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, London, Manchester, Southampton and Taunton.
For more information contact Peter Brewer at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
"Failure to connect with a LiP can have a serious adverse impact on the overall progress of a case, so it is incumbent on lawyers to take steps to help the case run fairly and smoothly."
DISCLAIMER: The statements, opinions, views and advice expressed in this article are those of the author/organisation and not of ENTIRELY. This article should represent information correct at the time of publication however whilst every care has been taken to present up-to-date and accurate information, we cannot guarantee that inaccuracies will not occur. ENTIRELY will not be held responsible for any claim, loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any information within this article or any information accessed through this site. The content of any organisations websites which you link to from ENTIRELY are entirely out of the control of ENTIRELY, and you proceed at your own risk. These links are provided purely for your convenience and do not imply any endorsement of or association with any products, services, content, information or materials offered by or accessible to you at the organisations site.